#|
In response, Mikami lost faith in his mother and began to hold her in contempt. His mother would eventually be killed in a car accident along with four of Mikami's "enemies. From then on, Mikami subscribed to the belief that anyone who did wrong should be punished, and he took it upon himself to enforce this belief as his hatred for evil grew "stronger and stronger.
These feelings eventually seeped into his career aspirations, and after graduating from high school with excellent grades and attending Kyodo University's Department of Law, he becomes a prosecuting attorney. Shortly after adopting his profession, Mikami learns about Kira through various media outlets. Mikami eventually becomes a member of Kira's Kingdom in hopes of being noticed by Kira through televised appearances.
After Near instills doubt in the Japanese Task Force , Light decides to elect a new proxy in order to stave off suspicion. Mikami, feeling honored by receiving Kira's power, realizes that Kira is unable to move at the moment.
Mikami takes action immediately and kills Demegawa and his men when they stray from Kira's word, after taking the Shinigami Eye Deal. In order to let Kira know that he needs to get in touch, Mikami goes on Sakura TV , claiming that Kira worshipers should await Kira's orders, and, should they not receive word from Kira, they should act upon themselves.
This was used a subtle way of letting Kira know that Mikami needs to get consent from Kira to do his killings, and, should Kira not be able to do so, Mikami will elect a new spokesperson and kill based on his own wishes.
After a few days, Mikami, feeling that Kiyomi Takada is intelligent and agrees with Kira, elects her as Kira's new spokesperson. When Takada begins questioning Kira on television and shares her own personal opinion on the matter, Mikami infers that Kira must have met up with Takada and told her to act the way she did on television.
During one of Light and Takada's private meetings, Mikami calls Takada via cell phone, and after asking her some questions, tells her to hand the phone over to the person she's having a meeting with, thinking it is Kira. Light confirms that he is Kira by revealing subtle details about the Death Note. From then on, Light communicates with Mikami through Takada by passing notes to her that instruct her to send specific messages to Mikami.
Light tells Mikami to forge a fake notebook while sending Takada clippings of some of the notebook's real pages in an effort to trick Near and the SPK , with Light expecting Near to swap the notebook with a fake. Using this strategy, Near, thinking the notebook Mikami is using is real, would swap the forged notebook with another fake, while Mikami brings out the real notebook during the anticipated final confrontation between Near and Light. In public, Mikami writes down names in this fake notebook while secretly sending Takada the name and face of the victim so that Gevanni , who is tailing Mikami, would be able to confirm Mikami is X-Kira and is using the real notebook.
Light also has Mikami say that his Shinigami is not following him anymore. This way, if and when Near would come into contact with the forged notebook, when he sees no Shinigami, he would not take that as evidence the notebook is a fake. Eventually, Near does indeed swap the forged notebook with another fake and Mikami, who checks the notebook with a microscope every day, confirms the swap with Light and Takada, ensuring their victory over Near.
Unexpectedly, Mello kidnaps Takada, who successfully kills Mello. Under Light's orders, Takada asks Mikami for the names of criminals so that she would be able to kill as many as she can. However, should Takada be seen by the SPK and the Task Force, the snippet of the notebook she keeps with her would be detrimental for Kira, so Mikami, not knowing Light has already killed Takada with his piece of the notebook, writes down Takada's name using the real notebook. Unbeknownst to Mikami, Near uses this opportunity to swap the real notebook with a fake one as well.
Near expects Mikami to have brought the fake notebook, with Mikami writing the names of everyone who would be after Kira, while Light expects Mikami to have brought the real one. However, thanks to Mello's intervention leading to Gevanni's discovery of the real notebook, the notebook Mikami brought is a fake, and Light is exposed as Kira, with Mikami having written the names of everyone attending the meeting except Light's.
In the manga, Mikami renounces Light as his god after the latter attempts to order Mikami to kill the task force and the SPK, despite having the notebook already confiscated. After being incarcerated, he mysteriously dies in prison ten days later, leading to Matsuda's theory that Near restricted Mikami's actions with the Death Note in order to convict Light. In the final episode of the anime, Mikami commits suicide by stabbing himself in the chest with a ballpoint pen, creating a diversion for the Task Force and SPK.
This gives Light the opportunity to flee the warehouse. During the ending credits, Mikami's body is last seen lying on the warehouse floor. Mikami is introduced in the first episode of the television drama series as the prosecutor who handled the case of Misa's murdered parents. He informs Misa that the murderer is getting parole, for which he makes no justification since he's upset himself.
He later joins into anonymous message boards in support of Kira, such as writing "I support Kira and the other Kira too. After Misa is secretly arrested by L, a rumor reaches Mikami that the police have Kira in custody.
After her release, Mikami confronts her, asking if she knows Kira. He gets more pushy when she denies it, and Light intervenes, so Mikami leaves. Yudagawa steals the Death Note from Misa before she touches it, so Mikami unwittingly gains ownership when he pulls it from the box later.
Who's to say you followed through with a torrent client to use it? If you haven't, what's the harm? Where are the damages? The harm is your IP address and other information being provided to a company that's trying to extort you As above, what's the cause of action?
If you get sued, you've suffered damages and you have a cause of action. You'd need to show that YTS wrongly provided your information, but in the hypothetical where you in fact did nothing wrong, that seems theoretically doable. You might have a malicious prosecution case against the party that sued you.
I still don't see a cause of action or damages against a third party that provided information that they likely would have been forced to provide in discovery anyway.
Illegal processing of personal data in violation of GDPR? This kind of trade with personal data is one of the big things GDPR is supposed to protect against. Nursie on Aug 23, root parent next [—]. National laws that implement the EU law are usually required for each country to implement the law in accordance with its own legal codes and structures. The UK is still inside most of the treaties until next year, as there is currently a "transition period" in effect, but even when that ends, a lot of EU law will still be part of UK law.
DanBC on Aug 23, root parent prev next [—]. I would also expect that they can only remove it after the end of the transition period. Being able to remove market protections while still being in the single market would give them an unfair advantage. Hence I believe, in this specific case, nothing has or will change as Brexit reaches its conclusion. The main EU body decides on a thing. Then each country in the EU reads the thing, and enacts legislation that does the thing.
Notably, each country in the EU write their own legislation such that the main EU thing is satisfied. What is the legal drinking age in the United States? Trick question: the US has no legal drinking age. The interstate highway act stipulated that if the federal government is going to spend money to build freeways in a state, the state has to enact a drinking age of 21 years.
There's a crapload of money tied up in this, so all 50 states have set the legal drinking age to 21 years. So if a state seceded from the union, while many federal US laws would no longer apply, the legal drinking age of 21 years would still apply, because that is a state law. The thing about the EU is that every law is like that. They're national laws that are mandated by the EU.
Presumably the UK will go through its books at some point and make adjustments as they see fit, but that hasn't happened to the GDPR. This is incorrect. I believe many member states did also implement it in local law, since they already had privacy laws and just adjusted them to be GDPR-compatible, but the GDPR would also apply directly.
I'm surprised there aren't torrent trackers that run on Tor available or maybe I just haven't heard of them. Seems like it would be a perfect way to avoid both shutdown and the service's ability to identify its users. Am I missing something? Santosh83 on Aug 23, parent next [—]. TPB has an. But the real danger with torrents is when you're actually sharing the data.
Any of the IPs you connect to could be a malicious peer who will later track down your IP through legal channels and send you abusive notices. I guess the way to protect yourself there is to torrent only over a VPN or through a seedbox. End game then is VPN providers get sued for piracy.
So people use VPN providers in uncooperative jurisdictions. Then VPNs eventually get coopted into sharing user information as IP owners invest more over time in copyright enforcement. Santosh83 on Aug 23, root parent next [—]. Yes, VPNs or even Tor can only work till a limit. Any technical solution can always be legislated as illegal and solved. So the real dispute is political and will be won or lost there.
Right now though except in some places, ordinary masses are loath to be politically active or informed, and this suits the few in power very well. Can switzerland even be considered "non-cooperative"? I mean, most people probably think so because of their reputation as a an "offshore bank", but that's been eroded due to the passing of FATCA.
Switzerland is interesting from a copyright aspect in multiple ways: - Downloading copyrighted material, even from obviously shady sources, is perfectly legal. For comparison, in Germany, downloading from "obviously illegal" sources is prohibited, further sharing a copy from such sources among friends is prohibited and since breaking copy protection is prohibited too, having a DRM-free copy of the content is a pretty strong indicator that it comes from an illegal source - unless you got it from a Swiss friend You can torrent over i2p in order to not leak your ip.
Yep, I'm gonna give a second request for what i2p is? Seems to be similar to tor? Can someone explain the differences? Sorry for what might be a very elementary question.
Is it something like Tor? Yes, it is like tor. Is there a single i2p universe or do you have separate self hosted instances. Are there active sites or communities it is it just a routing layer? Considering a tracker's job is to serve up connectable IPs then I'm not sure what the point is other than hiding the tracker's location.
It makes more sense in the context of a larger hypothetical infrastructure. If BitTorrent clients also had the option to publish their open port as a Tor hidden service, then they could register with a tracker that's also a hidden service, entirely over Tor; and then use the tracker to discover the Tor hidden-service addresses of other BitTorrent clients to connect to.
I often wish that the Tor overlay network was IPv6-based; then "hidden-service addresses" could just be IPv6 addresses in a particular IPv6 public subnet, reserved to represent the Tor overlay network. Then client software wouldn't need to know anything about Tor in order to take advantage; making a client "only operate over Tor" would just be a matter of giving the client an IPv6 subnet mask to restrict what it was willing to connect to; or putting it in a network namespace that was so-restricted.
I have toyed with DHTs successfully over Tor and it works work fine, but that's just peer discovery. If large data transfer doesn't go over Tor, you're still exposing your IP. If large data transfer does go over Tor you're potentially harming the network even if it's just to onion service by over using relays and Tor actively discouraged BT use over the network. There are alternatives like Tribbler, but none popular enough.
If the tracker itself is also on Tor, you don't need exit nodes, which are probably the most limited resource in the Tor design due to the legal challenges of running an exit node.
Download Brave. Stop being followed online Brave blocks all creepy ads from every website by default. This is a Vimeo video.
You'll need JavaScript enabled to view this. Online privacy made simple All the good of ad-blocking, incognito windows, private search, even VPN.
Switch in 60 seconds Quickly import bookmarks, extensions, even saved passwords. The new super app Brave brings truly independent search , free video conferencing , offline playlists , even a customizable news feed. Built-in features Brave. Google Chrome Chrome. Invasive ads blocked. Cross-site trackers blocked. Cookies blocked. Fingerprinting blocked cookie-less trackers. No IP addresses collected. Anonymized network routing Tor mode.
Download Brave Is the Brave Browser safe? To get started, simply download the Brave browser for desktop , for Android , or for iOS. The Brave Browser is available in nearly languages in all, including four different dialects of Chinese. Brave Search is currently available in English, French, German, Japanese, and Spanish, with support for many more languages coming soon.
The Brave Browser, Brave Search, and all their various features are made by Brave Software Inc, an independent, privately-held company. Brave exists to protect the individual.
0コメント